Art
  Censorship
  Censorship
  History
  Censorship
  of Youth
  Copyright   Internet   Media
  Policy
  Political
  Speech
  Sex and   Censorship     Violence in   the Media

  Home
  About Us
Archives
  Commentaries
  Contact Us
  Court and Agency Briefs
  Fact Sheets
  Issues
  Links
  News
  Policy Reports
  Press
  Reviews


Search FEPP



News

Two Reports on the Dangers of Our Clearance Culture

(November 22, 2005) - Two just-published reports highlight the problem of overly restrictive copyright control but also point out ways to help restore the copyright-free expression balance.

On November 18, the Center for Social Media at American University released its long-awaited "Documentary Filmmakers' Statement of Best Practices in Fair Use." Co-authored by five filmmakers' organizations, the Statement outlines four areas where the right of fair use should allow documentarians to incorporate copyright-protected material without obtaining permission and facing the often excessive permission fees that are charged by corporate copyright holders.

The four major areas of fair use outlined by the report are:

r Employing copyrighted material as the object of social, political, or cultural critique.

r Quoting copyrighted works of popular culture to illustrate an argument or point.

r Capturing copyrighted media content, such as music on the radio or a poster on the wall, in the process of filming something else.

r Using copyrighted material, such as archival footage, in a historical sequence.

The Statement is designed to give filmmakers guidance, to encourage them to assert fair use in appropriate circumstances, and to persuade distributors, insurers, and other media industry gatekeepers to recognize the importance and legitimacy of fair use.

The Intellectual Property Clinic at the University of Southern California, meanwhile, has published a Summary Report titled Efficient Process or "Chilling Efffects"? Takedown Notices Under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Based on a sample of nearly 900 "take-down" notices sent by copyright owners to Internet service providers demanding that they remove material from their servers, the researchers found "a disturbing number of legal flaws" in these notices, with a third of them demanding removal despite "a clear legal defense" to the claim of copyright infringement. The report concludes that "few are well-served" by the take-down process authorized by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, or DMCA.

The Brennan Center's forthcoming report, Will Fair Use Survive?, to be released on December 5, will address these issues from the perspective of artists, scholars, Web bloggers, and others who need to rely on fair use in order to contribute to culture and democratic discourse.

The report gives background on fair use and other free expression safeguards in copyright and trademark law. It evaluates a sample of 320 take-down letters sent under the authority of the DMCA, and summarizes scores of firsthand stories from artists, writers, and others, attesting to the frequent chilling effects that take-down notices, cease and desist letters, and industry-wide "clearance cultures" have on their ability to communicate and create. The report concludes with six recommendations for change.

For information on how to order printed copies of Will Fair Use Survive?, go to http://www.fepproject.org/policyreports/fairuseflyer.html.


The Free Expression Policy Project began in 2000 to provide empirical research and policy development on tough censorship issues and seek free speech-friendly solutions to the concerns that drive censorship campaigns. In 2004-2007, it was part of the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law. The FEPP website is now hosted by the National Coalition Against Censorship. Past funders have included the Robert Sterling Clark Foundation, the Nathan Cummings Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Educational Foundation of America, the Open Society Institute, and the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts.

All material on this site is covered by a Creative Commons "Attribution - No Derivs - NonCommercial" license. (See http://creativecommons.org) You may copy it in its entirely as long as you credit the Free Expression Policy Project and provide a link to the Project's Web site. You may not edit or revise it, or copy portions, without permission (except, of course, for fair use). Please let us know if you reprint!